|
|
|
|
|
|
Opposition Unity And V.P. Singh, By Inder Jit, 18 January 2024 |
|
|
REWIND
New Delhi, 18 January 2024
Opposition Unity And V.P. Singh
By Inder Jit
(Released on 11 October 1988)
All those
interested in seeing a strong Opposition emerge as a credible alternative to
the Congress-I at the national level will need to keep their fingers crossed.
The Janata, Lok Dal-B, Congress-S and Jan Morcha are due to meet at a
foundation conference at Bangalore today to launch their unified party to be
called Samajwadi or Rashtriya Janata Dal. High drama preceded this meeting
during the past fortnight and more. On occasions, the unified party appeared to
be coming through. On others, its formation looked like going up in smoke. It
was touch and go on Monday last week when the Steering Committee failed to
meet. Hopes revived when the Committee met a day later on Tuesday. But a
question mark again went up over its future by Friday night. Fortunately, Mr.
V.P. Singh, backed by Mr. R.K. Hegde, Mr. Biju Patnaik and many others,
persevered in their decision to hold the party’s foundation conference on
October 11, birth anniversary of Jayaprakash Narayan. Nevertheless, one
question remains. Will the leaders merely pay lip service to the Lok Nayak or
will they truly emulate JP and put the country before self?
The problem is
the unified party’s leadership has been resolved in favour of Mr. V.P. Singh,
notwithstanding some unnecessary and graceless remarks reportedly made by Mr.
Chandra Shekhar. Mr. Singh is undoubtedly the Opposition’s best bet today for
the next general election. He is widely viewed as a fine person and a man of
character and probity, unaffected by sharp Congress-I attacks on him and his
policies. But he has still to show that he has vision and qualities of
leadership required for guiding our huge country of over 800 million people and
for providing a good government. (Remember, self-government is no substitute
for good government!) Candidly, his popular image today no longer shines as
brightly as it did when he founded the Jan Morcha or impressively triumphed
over the Congress-I in the Allahabad by-election to the Lok Sabha in mid-June.
Even his friends and known supporters are concerned, if not worried. Willy
nilly, he seems at the moment to have needlessly reduced himself to the level
of the other Opposition leaders, most of whom have little charisma and even
less credibility.
Many
Opposition leaders feel that “VP” has not shown the decisiveness and boldness
expected of him as the new leader in the past few weeks. Mr. Singh, they argue,
was given full authority by the Janata, Lok Dal-B, Congress-S and Jan Morcha to
go ahead and form the unified party --- the SJD and a Steering Committee. But the
exercise has left much to be desired and, in the bargain, not only raised
doubts over the unity moves but even given a convenient handle to persons who
have been basking in his reflected glory during the past year to attack him
publicly. One can understand Mr. Singh’s desire to carry the leaders of all the
four parties with him in the footsteps of JP. I recall his telling me some time
back that the real art of politics lies in the management of disharmony and not
just of harmony. However, the outcome so far has been far from flattering. The
Steering Committee and its composition has not inspired much confidence, apart
from the fact that it has attracted avoidable flak and created an impression of
superficial ad hocism and absence of a national perspective. Surprisingly, Mr.
Singh failed to consult all those concerned.
The Steering
Committee, intended to be the nucleus of the new party, is dominated by persons
from UP and the rest of the Hindi States. True, the Hindi heartland is crucial
for winning the next poll battle. Nevertheless, the Committee needed to be more
representative of various regions and special interests such as the minorities,
women and youth. Surprisingly, the South is represented only by Mr. Hegde and
Mr. K.P. Unnikrishnan, who hails from Kerala. Maharashtra, Punjab and West
Bengal, too, are unrepresented. (Prof. Madhu Dandavate has been included only
as a special invitee) Equally surprisingly, women are conspicuous by their
absence. Several names come to mind easily, especially those of Mr. Mrinal Gore
and Mrs. Premila Dandavate. The Committee’s strength could have been increased
to at least 2 and even to 31 and not limited to 17, a figure which had no special
sanctity. Advantage should have been taken of the experience and approach of
the pre-independence Congress. Its Working Committee normally comprised 21
members plus some special invitees, if necessary.
The Opposition leaders have none but themselves to blame if their image
has slumped and fresh doubts have arisen about their ability to provide
credible alternative to the Congress-I. Far too many among them have been
speaking out of turn --- often at cross purposes. Far too many meetings have
been handled tactlessly, leading to avoidable heart-burning. A case in point is the meeting of the Steering Committee, which failed
to be held on October 3. It should have been convened only after differences
had been ironed out and ground work completed. Failure to hold the meeting only
tarnished the image of the Opposition at a time when it desperately needs to
win friends and influence people. Mr. Singh should have striven to ensure that
there was no confusion over the Jan Morcha’s stand in regard to the basic issue
of unity, leading to messy situation in which Mr. Ram Dhan felt emboldened
to publicly attack Mr. Singh as well as the entire leadership of the Janata,
Lok Dal-B and Congress-S and denounce it in astonishingly strong terms.
Not a little
of the blame must go to Chandra Shekhar. Undoubtedly, Mr. Chandra Shekhar is a
man of ideals and has not few other admirable qualities which made JP choose
him as the youthful President of the Janata Party in 1977. Sadly, however, he
has allowed his unrequited ambition to run away with his better sense and the
ideal of selflessness advocated by his mentor --- JP. Instead of helping the
Opposition parties to come together in response to popular demand, he has been
dragging his feet and seems to have left no stratagem untried to block unity
and “VP”. Mercifully, he did turn up at the Steering Committee meeting on
Wednesday last even if he was late by an hour. He also greed to the
persuasion of Mr. Singh and Mr. Hegde to head the Sub-Committee set up to
draw up the SJD’s policies and programmes. But his attitude at the meeting and
subsequently has left on observers the clear impression that he has been out to
“delay if not sabotage” the birth of the unified party at its foundation
conference on October 11. At one stage, he even wanted it called only the
“sponsoring conference.”
Mr. Chandra
Shekhar was theoretically correct when he said some weeks back that the
Opposition should seek to provide an alternative to the Congress-I and Mr.
Rajiv Gandhi and not merely substitute. He, therefore, insisted that the
proposed unified party and its policies and programmes were more important than
Mr. Singh as the new leader. But this stand ignored certain practical realities
in a country like India which continues to be soaked in feudal ethos. What ultimately counts here is the individual who leads a
party and not the party and its policies and programmes. Nothing
illustrates this more than the great success which the Congress achieved under
the charismatic leadership first of Mahatma Gandhi, and thereafter under Nehru,
Indira Gandhi and Mr. Rajiv Gandhi. The Janata Paty, too, won its great victory
in 1977 because of JP and his leadership. Equally illustrative is the
dismal failure of the CPI and CPM to make any great impact. The CPM has, no doubt,
continued to achieve remarkable success in West Bengal. But the credit for this
goes mainly to the personal popularity of its top leader, Mr. Jyoti Basu.
In retrospect,
many wish that Mr. Singh had heeded the advice of some of his trusted friends
and founded a new party, instead of taking on the sticky job of unifying the
Opposition. He could have transformed the Jan Morcha from what Mr. V.C. Shukla
smartly described as “a transit lounge” to a full-fledged party with a
constitution and a policy. He could then have invited individual members of the
Opposition as also intellectuals, academicians and professionals to join the
new party. Alternatively, he could have invited the Opposition parties to merge
with the Jan Morcha. In other words, he could (and should) have called the
shots. There is little doubt that most of the rank and file of these parties
would have gladly jumped on to his bandwagon, leaving their leaders high and
dry. Mr. Singh could have thereby saved himself the trouble of having to knock
time and again on the doors of Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Mr. Bahuguna and some
others. In essence, he would have taken over the Opposition armies and forced
their Generals either to surrender or take retirement.
Popular
opinion increasingly favours a strong Opposition. Even those who continue to
stand for Mr. Rajiv Gandhi feel that such an Opposition would be in the best
interest of the ruling Congress-I and the country. Much ultimately will depend
upon the quality of leadership Mr. Singh is able to provide and the success
with which he and his supporters can neutralize the mischief of those who are
unreconciled to his leadership and are certain to prevent him from functioning
effectively. Bangalore could help resurrect JP‘s dream provided the Lok Nayak’s
not remembered only ritually. He needs to be followed in practice and in
action, in sharp and distressing contrast to the happenings after the Janata
Government came to power in 1977. As we all know, JP died a sad and
disillusioned person. Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Mr. Bahuguna and several others owe
it to the Lok Nayak to give the country a credible alternative to the
Congress-I, having failed to prevent the collapse of the Janata Government in
1979. It is time for them and other veterans to see the writing on the wall
and, like Mr. Devi Lal, make way for the younger leaders --- and the new
heroes. ---INFA
(Copyright, India News and
Feature Alliance)
|
|
Ram Temple Consecration: FAREWELL TO SECULARISM?, By Dhurjati Mukherjee, 17 January 2024 |
|
|
Open Forum
New Delhi, 17 January 2024
Ram Temple Consecration
FAREWELL TO SECULARISM?
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
The consecration
of the Ram temple on January 22 may well have the country anoint a Hindu
religious city in Ayodhya like the Vatican City of the Christians or Mecca of
the Muslims, though it has always boasted of being secular. The Father of the nation,
Mahatma Gandhi, or even his direct followers and philosophers could have never
imagined that secularism would yield place to majoritarianism-- the transformation
that has taken place in the last decade raising a lot of heat and dust.
Apart
from the allegation that the consecration of the temple has been timed just
before the Lok Sabha elections, what is more surprising is the Prime Minister’s
claim that God had chosen him as “an instrument to represent all Indians during
the consecration”. This, in response to questions being raised over his
pre-eminence at the event. Modi said he had begun his 11-day special observance
as prescribed in the scriptures to “awaken divine consciousness” within himself
in the lead-up to the consecration. However, he did not specify what he meant
by special observance.
Though
the secular spirit is now being slowly vanishing from society, Mahatma Gandhi
himself never went to a Hindu temple. Only once he visited the Meenakshi temple
in Madurai in 1946 after the shrine was opened to Dalits to enter the premises.
Though Gandhiji described himself as a Hindu, his writings bear testimony to
his profound religious feelings, his understanding of Hinduism which was
completely different from what we see today and his chosen mode of worship was
inter-faith meetings, held in open grounds where Hindus, Muslims, Parsis,
Sikhs, Jains and Christians would pray together from verses of all scriptures.
The Mahatma tried to show that India belonged to all faiths equally and
propagated the essence of different religious faiths and doctrines.
The
Mahatma believed in the plurality of religions and abhorred any concept of the
superiority of some races or religions. Stressing the need for equal respect
for all religions, Gandhiji observed: “While I believe myself to be a Hindu, I
know that I do not worship God in the same manner as any one or all of them”. This
perception of the Mahatma cannot be said to be the majority view in the society
today. The ruling dispensation has made us believe that we should be proud of
our religion and in the process, denigrate other religions and the sentiments
of those who do not subscribe to the Hindu line of thinking.
It would
be pertinent here to mention that just a few days back, over 3000 Christians
from across the country registered a protest against community leaders’
culpable silence on minority rights and other grim realities while
participating in the Prime Minister’s Christmas celebrations. In an open letter
released recently, it stated: “The hard truth is that the Prime Minister and
his government have consistently disregarded their constitutional mandate, be
it to the minorities, the Adivasis, the Dalits, the backward castes, the
farmers, labourers, migrants etc. hence their gratitude to the Prime Minister
was not in our name”.
The
letter further emphasised that since 2014; in particular, Christians in India
have been victims of continued attacks and vilification from members of the
ruling establishment across the country. It was indeed distressing to note that
the letter even referred to Christians and Christian schools which “have been
hounded and harassed, their places of worship destroyed, they have been denied
their ordinary rights as citizens and been subjected to denigration and demonisation.”
If this
happens to be the attitude of the Christian community, one can easily presume
how the Muslims have been treated or, to use the right phrase humiliated, and
what they think of the present government and its attitude towards the
minorities. Obviously, the present genre of Muslims cannot be blamed for what
their forefathers have done, and they have a right to life, being citizens of
this democratic country.
This
brings us to the moot question i.e., while Ram is being worshipped and a grand
temple being built in his honour, can the country claim to have introduced ‘ram
rajya’ in India. The answer obviously is a big no. The ruling dispensation
has been rather poor in matters of governance and the entire development
process has largely ignored the lower echelons of society. The bottom tiers of
society have been greatly affected as the disparity in society has widened. Not
just income disparity between the rich and the poor but also between the urban
and the rural class, between the formal and the informal sectors, between
industrial workers and farmers etc. In the context of such development, all
talks of India emerging the third largest economy by virtue of increased wealth
of business tycoons such as Ambanis, Adanis and the Tatas appear meaningless.
Truth,
justice, equality are steadily vanishing from today’s society where violence,
jealousy and hatred is manifest. Thus, while eulogising Ram without following
the principles that he stood for and the way he ruled his kingdom smacks of
nothing but hypocrisy. Moreover, unlike Swami Vivekananda, Lord Ram is just a
mythological figure as the Anthropological Survey of India (ASI) did not find
any scientific evidence of Ayodhya being his birthplace.
Moreover,
religion has always been regarded as a private affair, but the ruling
dispensation has made it a political issue, obviously to reap benefits from the
coming Lok Sabha elections due shortly. While the Congress has decided to
boycott the inauguration on these grounds, the three Shankaracharyas have also
decided to skip the event for being held against what they consider
scripture-mandated norms.
It may
be mentioned here that Jawaharlal Nehru had adopted a stance, underlining the
need for the State to keep its distance from religion. However, the current
Prime Minister has projected himself as the sole guarantor of Hindu religion
and his party, along with the RSS, to propagate and spread Hinduism in the
world, though of a distorted version, much different from Vivekananda’s
approach of unity of all religion.
A
section of political analysts and sociologists are quite surprised at the
trajectory of the country’s political development to being a Hindu state. All
the fanfare about the Ram temple is just to ensure that the BJP is assured of a
landslide victory in the elections. And this is destined to happen as education
and awareness has yet to trickle down to the masses in the backward areas of
the country. They leave their destiny to the almighty.---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
Speaker Speaks But…: DEPOLITICISE OFFICE, By Poonam I Kaushish, 16 January 2024 |
|
|
Political Diary
New Delhi, 16 January
2024
Speaker Speaks But…
DEPOLITICISE OFFICE
By Poonam I Kaushish
Fatigued and bored of next week’s consecration of Lord Ram
at Ayodhya ? Flip attention to the west coast where a first rate emotion-filled
politico-drama is being enacted. Over Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Narwekar
taking over 18 months to rule the legislative wing of Shiv Sena led by Chief
Minister Shinde with 40 MLAs was the Party and not Thackeray’s faction, but
refused to disqualify his 16 legislators.
But post decision, given the high stakes, this order has
wider implications as both derive legitimacy from their association with late
Babasaheb Thackeray and the Party unit. Undeniably, the Speaker’s ruling has
lobbed the ball back to the Supreme Court as it is on slippery grounds when
tested against the anti-defection law which is built around a Party, not the
legislative unit.
Narwekar
maintained he could not ascertain which faction is the “real” Party since the Sena
Constitution and leadership structure of 1993 did not provide conclusive
answers and discounted Thackeray’s plea that Sena’s amended 2018 Constitution
made him Party Chief. He also ignored Supreme Court’s ruling May which held the
legislative unit has no existence independent of the Party as it fields
candidates who contest on Party symbol. Perhaps he based it on Election
Commission’s ruling which granted Shinde the Party symbol.
This
mess started in June 2022 when Shinde split with 40 MLAs dethroned the
Thackeray-NCP-Congress led MVA and formed a Government with Fadnavis’s BJP. Thackeray,
initiated disqualification proceedings and MVA appointed Dy Speaker obliged.
Shinde challenged this in Supreme Court which stayed rebels disqualification
till it heard the case in totality. It allowed Election Commission to decide
which faction would lay claim to original Party.
It is all very well for Shinde to
claim Balasaheb’s legacy but it remains to be seen if he can win over cadres
since the Sena’s inheritance is the late founder’s memory and the Party has
been his extension. Can the new leadership set aside Balasaheb family’s pitch
for his legacy?
At one level the battle should serve
as a warning for individual/family-centric Parties to set their house in order
and streamline functioning including holding organizational elections. At
another, defection has become a part of politics. However, fractured verdicts
do not give licence for a free-for-all politics of gaddi and gaddari which has
become chalti ka nam gaddi, with no
stops in sight!
The
issue is not whether Thackeray’s Sena moves Supreme Court on Narwekar’s
decision as the ruling has politics written all over it, neither that Parties have
used Speaker’s post as lollipop to reward and oblige a Party worker. Or,
whether a political appointee
should continue to be arbitrator in matters pertaining to legislators’
defection? And that it has sounded another death knell of a Constitutional
institution. But why Speaker is so important in the Constitutional
scheme of things?
If a Party splits
the Speaker decides whether it is a “split” or defection case. His ruling is
binding. By this one act he can “destroy” a Party and facilitate another’s
rule. Recall, Chandra Shekhar’s famous split which led to VP Singh’s Government
fall. Worse, its par for the course when MPs-MLAs-Speaker
roles are inter-changed at a drop of a hat. Whereby, ruling Party Ministers,
MPs and MLAs accept Speakership only to exploit the office for richer political
dividends. Whereby, it is increasingly difficult to keep track of Minister’s
becoming Speaker’s and vice versa.
From second
Speaker Ayyangar who became Bihar Governor on his term’s expiry to GS Dhillon
and Manohar Joshi who switched roles from Ministers to Speakers, Balram Jhakar
never concealed his identity as Congressman, Rabi Ray lived up to his Janata
Party’s expectation and Shivraj Patil who post Speakership, lost the
re-election, but was nominated by Congress to Rajya Sabha and anointed Home
Minister. In UPA I Congress MP and Minister Meira Kumar became Lok Sabha
Speaker in UPA II. Today eyebrows are not even raised.
All, conveniently forgetting the
Speaker represents the House, its dignity, freedom and liberty. According to Erskine
May, “The House has no Constitutional existence without him.” He has to ensure
Opposition has its say even as Government has its way. His rulings
and decisions can make or break the ruling Party. His casting vote can swing
the balance either way. Expected to be above Party politics and not the ruling Party’s
puppet.
Besides, his
powers to use, misuse or abuse Anti-Defection Act which
bestows the power of deciding whether a representative has become subject to
disqualification, post their defection on the Speaker offering ample scope to
him to exercise discretion and play political favourites, ignoring the letter
and spirit of the Act.
The entirety of a Speaker’s
decisions can also be an inducement for abuse. During Parliament’s winter
session over 146 MPs were suspended while protesting or during the. monsoon
session 2022 when 27 MPs were suspended. Ditto in 2016 when almost all DMK MLAs
were evicted en masse from Tamil Nadu
Assembly or the violence in erstwhile J&K Assembly resulting in PDP leaders
hurling abuses and pedestal fan at the Speaker, raise crucial questions about our
democracy’s health.
Such suspensions are increasingly
becoming common across Parliament and State Assemblies, with a partisan Speaker
in the vanguard of eroding India’s democratic character. Bringing things to
such a pass whereby a Speaker seems to have acquired a “larger than life image
and role” and has become the primus entre
peri.
A kind of a demi-God who can do no
wrong and whose actions are unquestionable. Forgotten in the quintessential
position, is the Speaker who is essentially servant of the House has fast
become its master, thanks to rules of procedure. Highlighting, falling
standards in conducting legislative business in Parliament and Assemblies and the need to clearly define these.
Undoubtedly, the Speaker’s position
is paradoxical. He contests election for Parliament or State Assembly and then
for the post on a Party ticket, and yet is expected to conduct himself in a
non-partisan manner, all the while being beholden to the Party for a ticket for
the next election.
Confided a former Lok Sabha Speaker:
“We are elected on Party tickets with Party funds. How can we claim
independence? Moreover, even if we resign on becoming Speaker, we would still
have to go back to the Party for sponsorship for next election.”
Where does one go from here? Time to
look afresh at the Speaker’s powers, depoliticize his
office and promote neutrality.
Under Westminster model, Speaker resigns from his Party on his
election and is re-elected unopposed in subsequent elections in the House of
Commons. Lok Sabha and Assembly Speaker’s impartiality is more important as he
has more absolute powers than his House of Commons’s counterpart.
Succinctly, the
Speaker is of the House, by the House and for the House. He has to place himself in a judge’s position, not
become partisan so as to avoid unconscious bias for or against a particular
view thus inspiring confidence in all sections of the House about his integrity
and impartiality.
Late CPM MP
Somnath Chatterrjee is a beacon. He refused to resign as Lok Sabha Speaker after
Left withdrew support to UPA I Government over the Indo-US nuclear deal in July
2008. Saying Speaker’s office was a high Constitutional post and above
politics. Like him we need to adopt the maxim: “Once a Speaker, always a
Speaker.” What gives?----- INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
Budget & The Voter: HOPES FROM ‘BARE-BONE AFFAIR’, By Shivaji Sarkar, 15 January 2024 |
|
|
Economic Highlights
New
Delhi, 15 January 2024
Budget &The Voter
HOPES FROM ‘BARE-BONE AFFAIR’
By Shivaji Sarkar
The
Union Budget 2024 may not be a glittering box butcould reveal a lot on the
Hindutva economy driving the country on to the fast track. It may not be
populist but may have lot for the electorate of ‘New India.’
Over the
decades a norm has evolved of presenting an interim budget lest the incumbent
government could take an advantage in elections. Being the election year, it does
not prevent the new budget from coming out with certain surprises as the Constitution
does not have any provision for an interim statement of accounts. It will be in
that sense a normal budget and the government is within its right to include
any proposal.
It may
spring surprises and consolidate the Hindutva importance on swadeshi-led
overall growth creating bonanza for investments. All sectors of industry and
finances may have a platter and it may go far beyond hackneyed tax reforms.There
is elation in official circles about the GDP numbers that is hoped to touch 7.3
percent and a four trillion level. The questions on calculating methodology,however,
are disposed as theoretical.
Some sections
of the media announced the income tax limit would be raised to Rs 7.5 lakh to
lure the voters, but it wasdenied later. People, however, forget that with the
last raise in the limit, the effective exemption is around Rs 7 lakh. So, it
does not require an announcement.Finance Ministry officials indicate that the
interim budget may have a waiver of tax collected at source (TCS) on individual
overseas credit and debit card expenditures up to Rs 7 lakh a year. This is in
the realm of speculation and helps only the most affluent.
There
are hopes that in view of the impending elections and unpopularity of the
vehicle scrapping policy, government might extend the lives of the vehicles,
particularly cars and tractors, as these hit largely the lower strata, or
upcoming middle class and farmers the most. This apart it is being said that
such vehicles have the lowest emission level of around 1 percent and are no way
the polluters.
The western
Uttar Pradesh farmers, strong supporters of BJP, are up in arms to protect
their diesel tractors. It is hurting the country’s economy. Most in the
government and even in the organisations related to the NDA want that such
moves which lead to unpopularity must be rectified. They believe that it gives
the Opposition an edge on populist issues such as vehicle scrapping, apparently
a move by the automobile makers’ lobby to boost their profits. Besides, farmers
are sensitive to many new developments. Their Kisan Samman Nidhi or farmers’
pension of Rs 6000 a year may see an increase to Rs 8000. The allocation of Rs
60000 crore a year might go up in the range of Rs 70000 crore.
While
putting curbs on diesel in the country, exports of diesel by private refineries,
including the Russian refinery in India, Nayara, have increased manifold to
Europe and the US as their profits swell. Transporters and others want
restrictions removed on domestic use of diesel and diesel vehicles. They have
also repeatedly said that car scrapping is unique to poor India. Nowhere in the
world, even in affluent US or Europe, vehicles are scrapped, and these are
allowed to ply for 40 years as scrapping hurts generation of wealth. It may be a
good move and help poll more votes, but whether it’s going to happen now is
anybody’s guess.
Concerns
have been expressed over the high petrol road cess and tormenting road toll
collections. The NHAI needs about Rs 1.25 lakh crore a year, but the total
collections are several times more in the range of Rs 7 to 10 lakh crore a
year. This is stated to hurt businesses. Transporters want it replaced by an
annual contribution on each truck and allowing free movement of non-commercial
vehicles. Lower rates and no toll gate are also stated to check inflation and
boost domestic tourism industry. These potent issues could have positive impact
in the elections.
Some of
the key political concerns are the poor, women, youth, farmers, and tribals, as
the BJP-NDA aims a third term in office over Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s
stress on ‘inclusive growth’. The Union Budget 2023 too had stressed on these
sectors. It is believed to have paid dividends politically in the recent
elections to five States--Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Telangana
and Mizoram.
There is
speculation that schemes meant for these sections of society might get more emphasis.
Education and skill development might get attention to address the aspirations
of the youth. The youth at age 18, comprising the first-time voters, are
considered an asset for the Sangh Parivar. Similarly, many more welfare schemes
for women are likely to be formulated.
Recall,
the Congress too had eyed these issues, particularly aimed at the women in
Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan along with lowering LPG cylinder prices. It would
be interesting to watch how Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman tailors her
budget speech on February 1 on this focal point. Political concern for women is
also because it’snow believed that they direct the polling trend significantly.
Earlier, this was the male preserve in rural India. Now vocal women are said to
challenge the male domination and often youth and rural farm workers are getting
swayed by their opinion.
Additionally,
tribals and other backward classes have stood largely with the ruling combine.
It might not be a surprise to see special programmes being announced for them. Prime
Minister Modi while flagging off the Vikasit Bharat SankalpYatra at Khunti in
Jharkhand had specifically mentioned that some sections which were not
beneficiary of many schemes would now be on government’s agenda. They may get a
substantial share of allocations and it could be the same for the hills and the
North-East.Ekalavya Model schools too may get further attention to connect with
the people in remote areas.
Sitharaman
herself has downplayed expectations stating that it would be a “bare-bone
affair”. This means the major concern is to have the appropriation bill passed
to keep the wheels moving till June. Practically it may focus on fiscal
discipline, check on expense limits, no major tax reforms though populist
policy shift and future path reset is possible. It could do certain course
corrections to address the growing debt for an economy touching four-trillion
mark. Many hopes even from bare bones!---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
National Rail Plan: WIDER EXPANSION CRUCIAL, By Dr. Oishee Mukherjee, 13 January 2024 |
|
|
Events & Issues
New
Delhi, 13 January 2024
National Rail Plan
WIDER EXPANSION CRUCIAL
By Dr. Oishee Mukherjee
Amid the
decade when there is a cry the world over to lower emissions, it is but
necessary that more attention to be given to railways. Its recent plans have
evoked much interest. As there is a crisis in getting a confirmed ticket in the
place and class of one’s choice, there is an imperative need for wider
expansion of the railway network in India.
It was
heartening to hear that there has been a decision to run 3000 additional mail,
express and passenger trains in the next four-five years to tackle the huge
problem of wait-listed passengers who cannot undertake their journeys.
Obviously, it is expected that the expansion would be in the routes where there
is lot of congestion, mainly in the metros of Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore,
Kolkata, Hyderabad and various tourist centres. Currently, around 500 crore
passenger trips are undertaken annually and this is likely to touch 1000 crore
in the next five years.
The
second major development follows from the first, i.e. to increase the number of
trains, there are plans to augment track capacity. In fact, recently Prime
Minister Modi flagged off 6 Vande Bharat Express trains and 2 Amrit Bharat
trains. The railways proposed a Rs 4.2 lakh crore mega plan for multi-tracking
of seven high density corridors – Delhi-Howrah, Mumbai-Howrah, Delhi-Mumbai,
Delhi-Guwahati, Delhi-Chennai, Howrah-Chennai and Mumbai-Chennai – for
introduction of faster passenger trains and quicker movement of freight. This
is, necessary as the speed of trains is quite slow compared to global standards
and very slow compared to the Western nations.
The
Railways Ministry from 2024-25 to 2033-34, plans to lay third and fourth line
on different stretches of these corridors according to the traffic
demand. The plan also includes construction of flyovers and underpasses,
among plans to introduce more modern trains like Vande Bharat with sleeper
facilities that have a maximum design speed of 220 kmph. In all 233 projects have
been identified that need to be undertaken on these corridors, which have
breached the saturation point and 200 such works will be completed in the first
phase—in next three years.
Union Railway
Minister, Ashwini Vaishnaw, outlined the transformative impact of seven
multi-tracking projects valued at Rs 32,500 crore, which received Cabinet
approval. These would propel the Railways into a new era of efficiency and
capacity expansion, with combined length expected to add 2,339 km to the
existing rail network.
The envisioned
outcomes are not limited to mere expansion but extend to relieving congestion
and enhancing operational efficiency, across 35 districts, spanning States of
Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Odisha, Telangana,
Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal. Apart from the infrastructure enhancements, these
projects are anticipated to augment freight capacity significantly,
accommodating approximately 200 million tonnes of additional freight traffic
annually.
Though
in tune with the National Rail Plan (NRP) for India, 2030, overall capacities
are being augmented, both in passenger and freight traffic, there is need to
think about affordability of all sections of the population. Indian railways has
a huge network but the average speed is one of the slowest in the world. The
need for faster trains can’t be doubted but fare structure must be such that it’s
affordable, at least to the middle-income sections. The fare of Vande Bharat
trains is higher than those of the Shatabdi and the dynamic fare system makes
it still higher.
Under
the Rajdhani pricing system, the base fare jumps by 10% for every 10% seats
booked, with a ceiling of 50% hike above the base fare. Unless the dynamic fare
structure is changed, travel by faster train will remain high and beyond the
capacity of a large section of people. Thus,
in planning more mail and express trains, there should be faster trains like
Amrit Bharat Express trains that are affordable to the lower income sections
and EWS facilitating their travel to their native villages.
It can
be admitted that a major milestone in the journey of the railways is the
development of automatic electronic block signalling systems at railway
stations. The automatic signalling system has been installed in 530 kms during
2022-23, as compared to 218 kms during 2021-22, registering an increase of over
143 per cent. This takes a lot of care in increasing line capacity and safety
measures on tracks.
The
government in the past few years also focussed on doubling of tracks with the
purpose to reduce or minimise train traffic. In budget 2023-24, Indian railways
has allotted Rs 30,749 crore just for doubling of railway tracks. This has not
only improved operational efficiency but also allowed for smooth movement of
trains.
In
building the much-needed infrastructure, huge financial requirements are
necessary for which resource generation needs to be found. In this regard,
upgradation of stations and giving space to the private sector has been a major
initiative. With over 400 redeveloped railway stations, these spaces are now
mostly congestion-free with non-conflicting entry and exit points. As per
figures available, Andhra Pradesh has 72 stations for transformation, Bihar 86
and Gujarat 87 railway stations for upgradation among other states. Another
source of generating revenue is upgrading the retiring rooms, with deluxe
facilities, and increasing their number so that both people on official work as
also tourists can use these.
Though
there could be a rise in passenger and freight fares, which have already
happened, there is a need to look into amenities, which are much below
standards. The unclean toilets of mail/express trains, specially in the sleeper
coaches, not to speak of the unreserved ones, has to be improved with proper maintenance
to ensure adequate supply of water during the full course of the journey.
A more disturbing
development is the occurrence of frequent accidents, which even after a lot of
progress in automatic signalling has not been curbed. Special efforts need to
be given in ensuring that accidents do not happen, and the unmanned tracks
cannot be allowed to continue.
Finally,
modernisation and expansion of railways in the country is imperative and has
the potential to boost up economic growth and bring about social integration.
The priority given to railways has been a right decision of the ruling
dispensation and it is expected that the network, performance, speed, passenger
facilities and safety measures would be taken care of in the coming
years. ---INFA
(Copyright, India News &
Feature Alliance)
|
|
| | << Start < Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>
| Results 91 - 99 of 5987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|